Comments on: Baggage & other fees http://archive.regulationroom.org/airline-passenger-rights/baggage-other-fees/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=baggage-other-fees From June 2 – September 23, the Department of Transportation took public comments on a proposed new set of airline passenger rights. DOT partnered with Regulation Room to offer people an easy way to learn about and have their say on this proposal. More than Regulation Room 19,000 visitors posted over 900 comments. The Regulation Room team summarized these comments and submitted the <a href="http://archive.regulationroom.org/airline-passenger-rights/final-summary/">final summary</a> to DOT. On April 21, DOT announced its decision. Regulation Room comments played an important part in shaping the <a href="http://archive.regulationroom.org/airline-passenger-rights/agency-documents/final-rule/">final rule</a> that gives airline passengers significant new protections. Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:09:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Draft summaries « Airline Passenger Rights http://archive.regulationroom.org/airline-passenger-rights/baggage-other-fees/#comment-1346 Draft summaries « Airline Passenger Rights Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:29:23 +0000 http://archive.regulationroom.org/airline-passenger-rights/?p=589#comment-1346 [...] it received.Tarmac delayTicket oversales/bumpingFlight status informationPricing & advertisingBaggage & other feesCustomer service plansPeanut allergiesForeign air carriersData reporting requirementsCosts and [...]

]]>
By: Rebecca http://archive.regulationroom.org/airline-passenger-rights/baggage-other-fees/#comment-1339 Rebecca Sun, 19 Sep 2010 17:39:06 +0000 http://archive.regulationroom.org/airline-passenger-rights/?p=589#comment-1339 Thanks for pointing out that we missed that. We will note it for inclusion in the final summary.

]]>
By: jmor123 http://archive.regulationroom.org/airline-passenger-rights/baggage-other-fees/#comment-1338 jmor123 Sun, 19 Sep 2010 05:32:35 +0000 http://archive.regulationroom.org/airline-passenger-rights/?p=589#comment-1338 There is one more item I think you folks forgot to put into the draft. I remember one poster mentioning that the baggage limit of 72 lbs for international should be returned. And I agree, because it will better limit how much people take on as carry on’s as they will not try to stop 20lbs of stuff in the overhead bins. Thanks.

]]>
By: Rebecca http://archive.regulationroom.org/airline-passenger-rights/baggage-other-fees/#comment-1335 Rebecca Wed, 15 Sep 2010 04:14:38 +0000 http://archive.regulationroom.org/airline-passenger-rights/?p=589#comment-1335 Right now the goal is to make sure we didn’t miss any information that was brought up in the discussion on the issue posts when we wrote the summary. It is not the time to argue your position. If you think we missed something, let us know.

]]>
By: Rebecca http://archive.regulationroom.org/airline-passenger-rights/baggage-other-fees/#comment-1334 Rebecca Wed, 15 Sep 2010 04:11:24 +0000 http://archive.regulationroom.org/airline-passenger-rights/?p=589#comment-1334 Thanks for reading the summary and commenting on what you think we missed. We will note your comment for inclusion in the final summary that we send to the agency.

]]>
By: yampalin http://archive.regulationroom.org/airline-passenger-rights/baggage-other-fees/#comment-1332 yampalin Wed, 15 Sep 2010 02:51:37 +0000 http://archive.regulationroom.org/airline-passenger-rights/?p=589#comment-1332 All information that airlines may be forced to publish should not be limited to websites. Airlines should also make them available in written brochures that may be obtained at request by mail or on ticket counters.

]]>
By: Rebecca http://archive.regulationroom.org/airline-passenger-rights/baggage-other-fees/#comment-1325 Rebecca Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:03:30 +0000 http://archive.regulationroom.org/airline-passenger-rights/?p=589#comment-1325 Thank you for reading the summary. However, this is not the time to re-argue positions. Right now, the goal is to ensure that the summary adequately covers everything that was raised during the discussion. If you feel the summary misses something that was already discussed, click on the paragraph you think needs work to comment.

]]>
By: jmor123 http://archive.regulationroom.org/airline-passenger-rights/baggage-other-fees/#comment-1321 jmor123 Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:29:08 +0000 http://archive.regulationroom.org/airline-passenger-rights/?p=589#comment-1321 I think one issue you failed to address is that some of us do not want to pay anymore fees period. Get rid of the check in bag fee, and do not allow airlines to charge for carry ons.

]]>
By: yampalin http://archive.regulationroom.org/airline-passenger-rights/baggage-other-fees/#comment-1319 yampalin Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:57:54 +0000 http://archive.regulationroom.org/airline-passenger-rights/?p=589#comment-1319 Baggage fees should be part of the basic fare, however, if they are ultimately separated, then airlines should be compelled to state them in a list that should also include all other “extras”, such as taxes and fees, and anything else charged separately. However, if an airline is going to charge separately for baggage, then it should also have to refund the charge if it loses the baggage. In fact, all charges for extras should be refunded when the extra is unacceptable, such as bad food, a non-working earphone, etc.

]]>
By: Rebecca http://archive.regulationroom.org/airline-passenger-rights/baggage-other-fees/#comment-1315 Rebecca Mon, 13 Sep 2010 22:12:46 +0000 http://archive.regulationroom.org/airline-passenger-rights/?p=589#comment-1315 Thank you for reviewing the summary. This is not the time to propose new arguments or re-argue existing positions. Now the goal is to ensure that the summary captures all the points that people made during the discussion. If you think something is unclear or wrong, please leave a comment on the section that you think needs work.

]]>