Comments on: For Borrowers in Trouble: Options for Avoiding Foreclosure http://archive.regulationroom.org/mortgage-protection/issue-posts/avoiding-foreclosure/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=avoiding-foreclosure The mortgage crisis showed that some residential mortgage lenders weren’t doing a good job of keeping careful records and communicating with borrowers. Some of this affected all borrowers, but the worst effect was that some people who could have worked out their problems with the right help, lost their homes. Congress has told the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to adopt new federal regulations to avoid this in the future. On this site, you can read about the new proposals, react to them, and discuss them with others. What you say here will make a difference: CFPB is required to consider public comment before making a final decision, and it will get a detailed summary of what Regulation Room commenters have to say. Thu, 04 Oct 2012 20:00:12 -0400 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: transparency http://archive.regulationroom.org/mortgage-protection/issue-posts/avoiding-foreclosure/#comment-294 transparency Sat, 08 Sep 2012 03:28:24 +0000 http://archive.regulationroom.org/mortgage-protection/?p=217#comment-294 It is important that if a house has gone into foreclosure that the payoff information remains the responsibility of the lender not the attorney taking care of the foreclosure. This is very important because I got a payoff from both the servicer and the attorney to see what would happen, in Florida. There was close to a $10,000.00 difference in payoff statements. The attorney overstated the payoff in almost every category that he gave to the closing agent. I have proof. The servicer still needs to provide service and be held accountable for the accuracy. The FBI has determined that Florida is one of the worst states for mortgage fraud and with over 90,000 attorneys in Florida the Florida bar revokes very close to “0″ licenses. So, leaving an attorney responsible for payoffs is a risk that is not necessary to take and I don’t think it should be allowed.

]]>
By: Moderator http://archive.regulationroom.org/mortgage-protection/issue-posts/avoiding-foreclosure/#comment-287 Moderator Fri, 07 Sep 2012 15:56:07 +0000 http://archive.regulationroom.org/mortgage-protection/?p=217#comment-287 Hi transparency, We are sorry if you feel you are not being heard or that our questions are too narrow. We should explain that the Regulation Room moderators are neutral, we don’t take a position on the proposed rules. Our job is to help every person contribute their viewpoints in way that will be useful to the agency when they finalize the proposed rules. During the discussion, we may point users to additional information about the rules, pose questions designed to prompt fuller or more detailed discussion, and facilitate discussion between users with different views. Our questions may appear narrow, because we only focus on issues the agency is addressing in these rulemakings. You can learn more about effective commenting and our project.

]]>
By: Moderator http://archive.regulationroom.org/mortgage-protection/issue-posts/avoiding-foreclosure/#comment-264 Moderator Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:35:12 +0000 http://archive.regulationroom.org/mortgage-protection/?p=217#comment-264 Hi transparency. We are sorry if you feel you are not being heard or that our questions are too narrow. We should explain that the Regulation Room moderators are neutral; we don’t take a position on the proposed rules. Our job is to help every person contribute their viewpoints in a way that will be useful to the agency when they finalize the proposed rules. During the discussion, we may point users to additional information about the rules, pose questions designed to prompt fuller or more detailed discussion, and facilitate discussion between users with different views. Our questions may appear narrow, because we only focus on issues the agency is addressing in these rulemakings. You
can learn more at the following links about effective… more »
…commenting in the rulemaking process and our project. « less
]]>
By: transparency http://archive.regulationroom.org/mortgage-protection/issue-posts/avoiding-foreclosure/#comment-262 transparency Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:46:35 +0000 http://archive.regulationroom.org/mortgage-protection/?p=217#comment-262 Moderator, maybe the government could buy one less military plane and fund this program. The American people are not afraid that Iran or Russia are going to bomb their homes. The American people are afraid of the banks that are already here, that collapsed the economy and are taking advantage of them now, by inflating the fees and then stealing their homes with fake document by hiring a slimy attorney. They are living with fear and anxiety because their chain of title has been destroyed with MERS and the banks are killing their homes values and stable neighborhoods are turning into rental neighborhoods with run down homes deserted with expensive insurance on them to fix them up but it is not being used, just billed. This system would be a lot cheaper than a plane and would save a lot more… more »
…families from destruction. It is sad, that something as complex as this situation is being handled in such a fragmented way with little progress in 4 years. The most important advise I can ever give you for all your questions is the need to start with a flow chart of all the problems and possible solutions. The fact that this has never been done is appalling! Please have a department at your school take this project on even if nobody asks except for me. I can fill up your chart. You have to really know what the problems are in there entirety before the correct solution can even be found. Any thing else is just putting the cart before the horse. Process of elimination after viewing the entire problem will always lead to the best solution. There needs to be a second chart from the flow chart that shows which government agency is responsible for implementing the solutions. Next, these government agencies need to meet monthly by video conference and present their progress and their goals for the following month. (You know the accountability thing.) We don’t have a good system for investigating the banks is the main problem. This is what lead to your limited questions in the first place and the reason we are emailing each other. An employee insider that has experienced one of these bank investigations left an interesting blog on your site that explains their process first hand. Why is it too much to ask for the leading Democrat and the leading Republican Congressman, Cornell rep., OCC rep., CFPB rep. Fareed Zakaria (for his analytical skills) and about 10 others to meet with this flow chart monthly and solve all the problems by video conference and hold our problem solvers feet to the fire by assigning expected results? I have not even begun to tell you everything that happened to me. Your questions are too narrow to address most of the issues my case exposes that need addressing. « less
]]>
By: Moderator http://archive.regulationroom.org/mortgage-protection/issue-posts/avoiding-foreclosure/#comment-260 Moderator Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:09:07 +0000 http://archive.regulationroom.org/mortgage-protection/?p=217#comment-260 Hi transparency, and thanks for your participation. If I understand you correctly, servicers and banks would need to provide information to the website you’re describing, so that consumers could access it. Who would bear the cost of maintaining the website?

]]>
By: Moderator http://archive.regulationroom.org/mortgage-protection/issue-posts/avoiding-foreclosure/#comment-231 Moderator Tue, 28 Aug 2012 18:50:54 +0000 http://archive.regulationroom.org/mortgage-protection/?p=217#comment-231 Regulation Room will be sending you an email regarding changing your screen name.

]]>
By: Moderator http://archive.regulationroom.org/mortgage-protection/issue-posts/avoiding-foreclosure/#comment-228 Moderator Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:46:21 +0000 http://archive.regulationroom.org/mortgage-protection/?p=217#comment-228 It sounds like you’ve had a tough time, fisch2821. Regulation Room can’t tell you how to proceed, but we suggest you contact a HUD approved housing counselor to see if they can help.

]]>
By: fisch2821 http://archive.regulationroom.org/mortgage-protection/issue-posts/avoiding-foreclosure/#comment-224 fisch2821 Mon, 27 Aug 2012 23:48:23 +0000 http://archive.regulationroom.org/mortgage-protection/?p=217#comment-224 Would like to change my screen name, please. How do I do this and I do not want some information shared.

]]>
By: fisch2821 http://archive.regulationroom.org/mortgage-protection/issue-posts/avoiding-foreclosure/#comment-223 fisch2821 Mon, 27 Aug 2012 23:45:33 +0000 http://archive.regulationroom.org/mortgage-protection/?p=217#comment-223 We purchased a home in CA in 2005 via Country Wide with an adjustable rate interest. We also took out a 2nd with Citi. Citi purchased our first from Country Wide. We are currently 40% underwater.

We worked with NACA and waited 5 months to be approved for a lower fixed interest rate on our 1st two years ago.

We fell behind on our 1st due to multiple health related issues (major car accident & work related injuries). We jumped through hoops with Citi for 5-6 months, again, via NACA regarding the 1st.

We stopped making payments in Jan 2012 due to the lack of income during the injuries and in order to persuade them to work with us. They resently sold our 1st to Carrington, after telling us that we made too much money to qualify for any type of loan modifiation (days prior to selling… more »

…our loan). Meanwhile, we put the majority of our house payment money in a savings account.

Citi via NACA refused to negotiate with us on our 2nd. Now Carrington is telling us that we qualify for a FHA 30 year fixed rate mortgage @ 6.50% and that they will pay off the 2nd (Citi now is willing to take only $7,000 for a $95,000 @ 7.75%).

We are both still employed, but we are facing some possible lay offs due to Sequestration in Jan 2013 and will have a large increase in our Health Insurance, beginning Oct. 1st, via the employer, along with furlough days. More furlough days may be on the way after the November 2012 elections (up to 15).

We are working with NACA to see if we qualify for the HAMP, but they do not think we will qualify based upon our income, right now. We physically have recovered, for the most part, from our injuries and have some current pending litigation which will take years to settle.

Carrington and First Alliance Bank are very, very interested in us pursuing the refinance option as opposed waiting for the results of the HAMP determination (had to resubmit all paperwork via NACA for Carrington).

I am not in such a hurry to follow through with the refinancing until I hear about the decision regarding the HAMP.

Could there be other options for us? We now have credit scores of 630 and 650 instead of 730 and 720 (prior to stop making 1st mortgage payments). A 6.50 interest rate sounds very high and we are current with all of our creditors.

Can we put off filling out the paperwork for the refinancing until we receive a decision on the HAMP?

« less

]]>
By: transparency http://archive.regulationroom.org/mortgage-protection/issue-posts/avoiding-foreclosure/#comment-206 transparency Sat, 25 Aug 2012 14:20:29 +0000 http://archive.regulationroom.org/mortgage-protection/?p=217#comment-206 Where the note and mortgage are missing the bank should not be allowed to report to the Credit Bureau. The credit reporting agency should not be based on the hear say of a bankster. This is unethical and unfair. This would leave a lot of people with good credit where they can buy a new home again because of bank fraud and irresponsibility. Why is it a bank that admits they have no proof you owe them anything, with a lost note and mortgage, can leave a life wrecking statement that says you do owe them? And there is no place for the homeowner to report on the banks fraud, racketeering, pay to play, empty insurance shells set up for billing etc… so the bank can not loan money any more. In a fair society, this would be working both ways, the same. This has to change! Instead of 10 questions… more »
…listed above, why not put all consumer mortgage issues up there and put this recovery on the fast track? Then on the front of AOL and Huffington Post, put a link to where the CFPB is asking for your voice to be heard, with additional Mortgage solutions and a link to your site. Go on CNN and provide your link and tell about the program and read some of the good ideas you are already receiving. Unless this has only been set up for a few days there are not very many comments and lack of exposure will lead to minimum results, instead of maximum results. Blog it and put up articles all over the web. Again your success will be based on using all cutting edge computer technology. Cutting edge computer technology is the answer to most of the problems. Also, banks say “This call may be recorded for quality ….” Why not require the bank to change this to “Both parties are allowed to record this call for quality assurance” this will change a lot of the banks bad behavior with a couple of words on a recording. Simple solution to a huge problem. « less
]]>